Mr Fraser Kemp MP

	Sign In Sign-Up

Mr Fraser Kemp MP.

14 Neasham Place

Houghton-le-Spring,

Tyne-Wear.

My Ref:MK/LP/FK02

3rd November 2001

Dear Mr Kemp

I thank you for your reply to my letter of 1st November 2001. You have written that you have noted its contents. I am happy that you have done that but you have not said what action you intend to take on that which I have reported to you?

The catalogue of crime against me continues to grow. To refresh your memory I briefly detail in the following paragraphs some, though not by any means all, of the crime I refer to. Though this letter is necessarily very long, it is only the tip of a very large iceberg of situations which exist throughout Britain. It is hoped that by going into reasonable detail

of the matters I report to you, it will spare me any future possible necessity to repeat it all again to you.

I also enclose a copy of a letter dated 4th June 2001 which I sent to the Prime Minister and which was passed by his office to the office of the Home Secretary. The Home Office failed to take any action over what I had reported to the Prime Minister even though the Prime Ministers Office wrote that the matters contained within my letter were the concern of the Home Office.

1) In 1986 I was battered and then struck by a car that was driven at me. The Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court proceedings which followed that were unlawful. The single magistrate who heard the case was not empowered to act alone. Both the Clerk to the Justices at that court and the Lord Chancellors department were party to the cover up of those illegal proceedings. My problems began when I refused to accept the cover up. I was satisfied that Masonic influence had allowed and was involved in that situation

2) Myself and my family became subject of a death threat by stabbing. The man who made that threat repeated it to Northumbria Police. No action was taken by them.

3) My wife and I were subject of assault with damage to our property following that assault. The man who carried that out admitted it to Northumbria Police. They took no action on it.

4) Seven hundred pounds worth of damage was caused to my property following a pursuit of a stolen car by both Durham and Northumbria Police in January of 1998. Both forces claimed they had no liability for that damage. The damage still remains.

5) In civil court action at the Durham County Court, Deputy District Judge Baird heard my appeal from the ruling of District Judge Scott-Phillips sitting at the Durham County Court. That was unlawful. A Deputy District Judge is not allowed to hear an appeal from the higher court. There was an attempt to cover up that matter and evidence of that is available..

6) An injunction was granted against me at the Durham County Court by District Judge Cuthbertson in 1995. I had not been informed of when the court hearing was to take place which had granted that injunction. Subsequently I was imprisoned when I was found guilty of breaching it

7) An order was granted by District Judge Scott-Phillips sitting at the Durham County Court to allow me to go to the office of solicitor Nancy Bone to take copies from my files. When Nancy Bone breached that order, District Judge Scott-Phillips claimed he had not granted the order and my visit had only been done with Mrs Bone's permission. When Nancy Bone was eventually struck from the Register of Solicitors, in the files she held belonging to me was her court attendance notes when District Judge Scott-Phillips had ordered that I be allowed to attend her offices. Her court attendance notes confirmed the order that had been made by District Judge Scott-Phillips. There was also a copy of a letter which Mrs Bone had written to Durham County Court. In that letter she also referred to my visit to her office as "an order of the court."

8) Detective Sergeant McGann and Detective Constable Storey of Northumbria Police falsely alleged that to swear false information in a Statutory Declaration was not a police matter. Both officers had been presented with evidence that solicitor John Paul Graney, since struck off, had sworn perjury in his statutory declaration. That Statutory declaration with its perjured contents had been used to lodge a caution at HM Land Registry in the matter subject of dispute under case number NE401650.

9) Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding sitting at the Newcastle County Court in October 1996 falsely alleged that County Court cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650 had been subject of a consolidation Order and then he tried the actions as a single case. At that time an Order made at the Durham County Court refusing that consolidation was in force. Mr John H Fryer- Spedding then carried out a catalogue of additional acts which were clearly meant as further acts to pervert the course of justice. A number of them are proved as such by means of the recorders own approved transcript of judgement

10) My application for leave to appeal what indisputable and substantial evidence shows was the perverse judgement of recorder John Fryer-Spedding was heard before Lords Justice Auld and Pill at the London High Court. It was I think Lord Auld who lectured me that Freemasonry would not have been responsible for my situation. I had provided the High Court with considerable evidence to back my allegations that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had used fraud and other acts to pervert the course of justice in the matter of cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650. Part of that evidence was that at the time recorder Spedding had falsely alleged that the three latter cases had been subject of a consolidation order, there was in fact an order in force at that same time made at the Durham County Court on 1st June 1994 refusing my opponent Miss Carr's application for that consolidation. Under Supreme Court Rules John H Fryer-Spedding was required to have seen such an order for consolidation of the three cases. In the circumstances he is also shown to have been in contempt of the Supreme Court. In the circumstances that the three cases had not been subject of consolidation, then the time I should have been allowed to present my application for leave to appeal should have reflected that. I was only allowed the same time to put my case as is allowed for a single case. When I later requested Lords Justices Auld and Pill if they were members of the Freemasons they would not give that information. None of the judges involved in the three cases I refer to would confirm or deny that they were masons despite all being aware that I had contributed to the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary. They had therefore refused to give me information to allows me to decide whether or not the courts over which they presided in those actions had been impartial to the proceedings before them. My application for leave to appeal was refused.

11) Recorder John Fryer-Spedding ruled that my father was the one most likely to have gained title to the land subject of case NE401650. He agreed that both my father and I had used the land without disturbance for well over twenty seven years. In those circumstances he had agreed that both my father and I had undisputed title to that land but would not make that outright ruling. He also ruled that my opponent Miss S. Carr had no title to it. I represented my father in his action to go back into possession of the land. It was heard at the Sunderland County Court before Circuit Judge Helen Paling. When she entered the courtroom she warned me not to speak and then minutes afterwards dismissed the action. My father took ill during Judge Palings verbal onslaught on me and left the courtroom. The court usher told me that if I had continued to try to put my fathers case I could have been held to be in contempt of court and be imprisoned. The explanation Judge Paling gave to the Lord Chancellors department about her conduct in that matter did not hold water. The fact was that despite being aware that I represented my father in his action, Judge Paling had refused to allow me to put his case. That was a gross violation of both my and my fathers rights. It was also a gross violation of the rules of justice. Despite recorder John Fryer-Spedding having ruled that Miss Carr had no title to the land subject of case NE401650 she was allowed to register the land in her name at the Durham District Land Registry. Despite a number of approached by me to Mr Patrick Timothy the Chief Registrar at the DDLR he has failed to provide me with an explanation as to how such registration has been allowed.

12) The costs awarded against me by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding by use of his fraud and many false instruments was the basis of a bankruptcy order made against me by District Judge Jones sitting at the Durham County Court in March of 1999. Several times during a hearing before him he told me that I had upset District Judge Cuthbertson. That was proof enough that Mr D J Jones was far from impartial to the proceedings before him which is of course a requirement of the justice system. He like the other judges at the Durham County Court must have been aware that recorder John Fryer-Spedding had used fraud and other acts to pervert the course of justice in the cases DH400950, DH400898 and NE401650. I had provided the Durham County Court with evidence of my allegations but its clear that no amount of evidence would change their minds once they had decided I had to pay a price for not accepting the gross injustice they had carried out against me. Possibly it may well also have been that my having contributed to the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary was reason enough for the criminal acts they have carried out against me?

13) For use in my appeal against alleged bankruptcy at the London High Court in October of 1999 I provided Mr Peter Lever QC with indisputable evidence that my alleged bankruptcy had been obtained by means of fraud and acts to pervert the course of justice that had been carried out by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. Mr Spedding had also allowed and assisted my civil opponent Miss Shirley Carr the use of substantial and very material perjury. Mr Lever QC said he had no interest in that evidence and refused my appeal. My civil law opponent Miss Shirley Carr is employed as a National Insurance Inspector. It was around some four years ago that I first provided you with indisputable evidence of the latter facts. As you may be aware I have published some of the evidence of my allegations.

14) In November of 1998 I was convicted at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court of alleged harassment of Miss Shirley Carr. This you will recall is the same court which conducted unlawful proceedings in 1986 following my having been battered and then struck by a car that was driven at me. Mr Bavidge had been the Clerk to the Justices both in 1986 and in 1998. I was charged with having contacted Miss Carr's employer, the National Insurance Contributions Agency at Longbenton, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, of my concerns that Miss Carr was carrying out activities not consistent with what she had said was her full time occupation as a National Insurance Inspector. Those activities were carried out at times it was reasonable to believe that Miss Carr should have been involved in her full time employment. I admitted to the court that I had contacted Miss Carr's employer to report the latter facts. I considered then as now that it was my public duty to have reported such things to the National Contributions Agency more so as Miss Carr is a paid public servant and there was a possible question of crime being involved.

I had also previously expressed concern to to the NCA that Miss Carr had been keeping a considerable number of National Contribution Agency files at her home. Their reply was that she was sworn to the Official Secrets Act. The man that lives with Miss Carr is not so sworn and nor had I been when at times I had access to those files when I visited Miss Carr to assist he with her in disputes with others at a time before hostilities commenced before us.

The other charge was that on the 13th August 1997, at the Sunderland County Court, I had approached and threatened further harassment of Miss Carr. Though Miss Carr agreed that she had been carrying out the activities I had reported to her employer, The national Contributions Agency, the court decided that by reporting those facts was an act of harassment. The charge relative to the alleged Sunderland County Court Incident of 13th August 1997 was also proved. I had not approached and threatened Miss Carr any alleged further harassment of her. In or around March of this year I was able to obtain evidence by way of a letter sent from the Crown Prosecution Service to my solicitor who represented me in 1998. The letter, dated 14th May 1998 was confirmation that both Northumbria Police and the Crown Prosecution Service had been aware that a security officer of the Sunderland County Court on duty at the time of the allegation made against me of 13th August 1997 had told police that he had been in the courtroom as a precaution and said that nothing of note had happened. The contents of that letter were of course very material to my defence but it was not brought to the attention of the court and I had not been made aware of its existence before or during my trial for alleged harassment of Miss Carr. At a meeting at Northumbria Police Headquarters in May of this year three of its senior police officers agreed that the information was material contined within the letter of 14th May 1998 was very material to my defence and agreed to investigate its suppression during the Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court Proceedings. They have failed to do that and have ignored my subsequent letters regarding it. I provide here for your information a copy of that letter An author and documentary film producer was present as a witness throughout my meeting with those three Northumbria police Officers. The Houghton Magistrates Court ruled that I was not allowed to note any of the times Miss Carr might be carrying out activities which were not consistent with her full time employment as a National Insurance Inspector. The court also ruled that I was not allowed to report such activities to Miss Carr's employer, The National Contributions Agency. I was only to be allowed to report such activities to the Minister responsible for the National Contributions Agency. Of course I was not allowed to record by any means times and detailsof those activities so as to be able to place them in writing to the Minister responsible which in this case is Mr Alistair Darling MP. My attempts to contact Mr Darling by telephone at times Miss Carr's activities concerned me were not successful. His office at the House of Commons said that he would only speak on the telephone to those he knew.

There was and remains considerable evidence of Miss Carr's use of perjury during the civil proceedings between us. Some of it has now been published and was supplied to my solicitors for use in my defence. Not a single item of that evidence was used. Documentary evidence is now available that the barrister who represented me at Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court in November of 1998 was of the opinion that matters concerning the civil proceedings between Miss Carr and I were important to my defence. However, in the circumstances, none of the evidence of Miss Carr's use of perjury during the civil proceedings between us during those proceedings was used in my defence.. The question also arises of course as to why the Crown Prosecution Service carried out a prosecution of me when they were the authors of the letter of 14th May 1998 in which a security officer had said that nothing of note had occurred in the Sunderland County Court. That was at the time Miss Carr had alleged I had approached and threatened further harassment of her at that Court.

15) I was again arrested by Northumbria Police officers following an allegation that I had breached the order made by Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court in November of 1998. I immediately made a statement denying that I had done that. None of that statement was written down by any of the two police officers who had carried out the arrest. One of them found my situation highly amusing and made that clear to me. I made further statements while being taken to Washington Police Station by those officers. None of those statements was written down either. Both police officers later falsely alleged that I had not made any statements following their arrest of me. I had requested that someone be informed of where I was being held by police. That was denied to me. I requested a solicitor to attend me. That too was denied to me. I asked for a doctor to attend to me. That too was denied to me. I suffer from some serious illnesses and for one of those illnesses I have been undergoing chemotherapy for almost ten years. When it became very clear that police were acting improperly and their acts were nothing short of criminal, I had began to feel very ill. Only when I was on the point of collapse did the two police officers who had arrested me take to Sunderland Royal Hospital and effectively dumped me outside of its casualty wing and then they drove off. There it was confirmed that I was seriously ill I suffered further injury there when a tube that was inserted into a vein in my arm became twisted..

16) Later I was charged with assault on Miss Carr. I had not been arrested for that by Northumbria Police. Yet another false allegation had been made against me by Miss Carr. In fact what had taken place was that Miss Carr had entered onto my property and was damaging shrubs on it. She had then seized my walking stick and struck me with it. It should be noted here that the allegation under which the latter arrest took place and the charge then made against me were not the same. My arrest in the circumstances had been unlawful. Northumbria Police are aware of that fact, as indeed was my former barrister, but as is their usual practice are ignoring my correspondence to them about that matter Northumbria Police had not even interviewed me on the matter of Miss Carr's allegations which she had made against me. I think that was representative of people in the paid public service who were and have continued to carry out any act , however improper or illegal, which would result in causing me harm and damage.

I elected to be tried by jury at the Crown Court on the matter of the later allegation made against me by Miss Carr. I am satisfied that it would have been shown that Miss Carr had edited a tape recording that she claimed was made at the time I had allegedly assaulted her. Evidence shows that she had carried out a similar act in 1996 when I was subsequently imprisoned for alleged contempt of court. Of course given the facts, Northumbria Police would not want to investigate that matter either. A Chief Constable who is a mason such as the Chief Constable of Northumbria has sworn oaths to uphold Freemasonry is not allowed under such oaths to assist those opposed to the power and influence of Freemasonry such as myself. I also had further evidence to show that Miss Carr had lied in the allegation that she had made against me. I went to Crown Court several times and my case was taken out of listing on each occasion without explanation. That caused considerable tension and stress to me. Northumbria Police were fully aware that I had very serious illnesses any of which stress could have brought about my possible death. On two occasions when I went to the Durham Crown Court for trial I was told that it was instead to take place at Newcastle. I had never previously been informed of that. On both occasions I had to make a dash by car from Durham to Newcastle. On one occasion at the Durham Crown Court my barrister came to me and said that the Crown prosecution Service had offered a possible deal. The deal was that if I agreed to remove material from my Internet web site regarding perjury etc. used by Miss Carr in the civil proceedings between us then they the Crown Prosecution Service in turn would consider dropping their action regarding Miss Carr's allegations against me. At first on advice I accepted the possible deal.

After I had considered the possible deal shortly afterwards I realised that what was being attempted was nothing short of blackmail by the Crown Prosecution Service for the benefit of Miss Carr, I refused the possible deal on offer. Later the Crown Prosecution Service discontinued their action against me, instead leaving it lying on file, following remarks by the Crown Court judge that the prosecution case against me was not in the public interest, was a waste of public money, and would be nothing short of a pen pushing exercise. The judge had previously asked if I wanted a tape recording made by Miss Carr to be played to the jury. I had replied that I wanted that. I believe that the judge could well have concluded that the tape recording had been subject of editing with material parts being left out from it. That is in fact what had taken place.

17) I made you aware several years ago while I was a member of the Hetton-le-Hole Town Council The City Of Sunderland Unitary Draft Development Program had came up for discussion. Included in that plan for proposed housing was an area of land owned by Councillor James Blackburn. He failed to declare that interest to the Council meeting. In addition, both his mother and father Councillors Joyce and Samuel Blackburn also failed to declare an interest along with Councillor .James Blackburn's brother in law, Councillor C.J.Simpson. Councillors Joyce Blackburn and Simpson both spoke in favour of the proposed housing development. When I informed the Council meeting that none of those Councillors had declared an interest and that none of should have spoken on the proposals, another meeting was arranged to discuss only the Development Plan.

At the next meeting again none of the Councillors I have named declared an interest in the Plan. Again Councillors Joyce Blackburn and Simpson spoke in favour of the housing proposals contained in it. I stood up and again declared my concerns to the Council meeting that what those Councillors were doing by failing to declare an interest and then speaking in favour of the housing proposals was highly improper. The meeting was then brought to an abrupt end. Shortly afterwards I was barred from leaving the Council Chambers and was then assaulted by Councillors James Blackburn and his mother and father Councillors Joyce and Samuel Blackburn . I only escaped serious injury when Councillor George Wandless took hold of Councillor James Blackburn as he prepared to strike a blow to my head while his mother and father held me. It may be of interest that before that meeting took place Councillor James Blackburn, a mason, asked if I owned my house. The implication later being realised that unless I kept quiet on the matter of failure to declare interests then my home was at risk. I doubt now that it was coincidence when later recorder John Fryer-Spedding set the scene by means of his fraud etc which was to bring about my engineered bankruptcy and of course the subsequent risk to my home which still hangs over me.

I reported the matter of the none declaration of interests and the assault on me by the above named Councillors and indeed false imprisonment of me in the Council Chambers to Northumbria Police . Superintendent Williams was appointed to investigate the matter. Very shortly afterwards he contacted me and said that as he did not think that the rest of the other Councillors present in the Chambers at the time of the assault and imprisonment of me would say what they had seen of the incidents, he said he had decided he was not going to take any action on it. I did not accept that reasoning. In a court of law those Councillors present in the Council Chambers during the incidents I detail would have been required to give testimony to what they had seen of them. None better than Superintendent Williams would have been aware of that.

18) Shortly after the assault on me and false imprisonment at Hetton Council Chambers the matter of the use of a local quarry came up for discussion before a meeting of the Hetton Town Council. The matter had been raised by Councillor Mrs F. Anderson. I supported her in the discussion. Around some two weeks afterwards the owner of the quarry visited my property and warned that I should keep quiet about the use of his quarry. I refused to do that. He then punched me and when I tried to get into my home to telephone police, he threw me headlong down some steps. I have great trouble in walking due to severe problems with my legs. My ankle became trapped in the stones of a rockery and suffered injury. When Northumbria police officers arrived the quarry owner was still at the scene. They radioed for an ambulance when it was thought my right ankle had been broken in the incident. It was severally swollen. I spent the rest of the day at Sunderland Royal Hospital where my ankle was strapped up. I was told that it was possible some of the smaller bones in my ankle had been damaged but the main joint was not broken.

I learned that Northumbria Police had taken no action to investigate the quarry owners assault on me and contacted them. They agreed that the quarry owner had not even been interviews on the matter of his assault on me. That was weeks after the assault. Shortly afterwards an officer of Northumbria Police called at my home and said no action was to be taken on the matter of the quarry owners assault on me. When I asked why that decision had been taken he was unable to give a reason for it. However, as he left, he asked me if in the circumstances I intended to continue being a member of Hetton Town Council.

I have previously made you aware that Northumbria and Durham Constabulary are protecting the crimes that have been carried out against me by judges, Miss Carr and solicitors. In the case of Durham Constabulary I have also made you aware that they say that when a judge lies it is a judicial decision and is therefore protected. That as you will surely accept is untrue. The way a judge arrives at his decision is protected. Judicial misconduct is not protected. In the circumstances they refuse to take action against the judges I have named to them along with evidence I have provided, some of which has since been published. Then I have the problem with North Yorkshire Police. Its Chief Constable Mr Kenworthy refused to have an investigation carried out into forgery and deception used against me. When I asked a number of questions about his conduct and his failure to do his public duty he failed to answer my questions regarding those matters. When I contacted North Yorkshire Police Complaints and Discipline Department Detective Inspector Napier told me that as my complaints were against the Chief Constable she was not authorised to investigate them. However she said that she wanted to travel from North Yorkshire to visit me to discuss the situation. Two appointments were made but not kept by her. Weeks passed by. Several weeks ago two other detectives from North Yorkshire Police visited me at my request. I then provided them with indisputable evidence of forgery and evidence which showed that regardless of the legality of my alleged bankruptcy, in fact I could not have been as my wife had financial resources hidden away in private accounts concealed from me amounting to well over ninety thousand pounds. The evidence I provided to the detectives who visited me was in my wife's own handwriting where she detailed the amounts of the various savings accounts, where they were and the amounts held. My alleged bankruptcy was in the sum of £15.800. In addition I made known to North Yorkshire Police that my wife had purchased a property at Dacre Banks, North Yorkshire, in May of 1998 in the sum of £65.000 cash. In June of 1998 she had commenced divorce proceedings against me.

It was in March of 1999 that I was declared bankrupt following the use of fraud etc. which had been used to engineer it. In early 2001 I had informed the Official Receiver at Stockton-on-Tees that my wife had purchased that property and the sum involved. Still the Official Receiver ignored that and allowed the stress of which I was subject as a result of his actions to continue. For your information, In bankruptcy all financial transactions for a period of two years leading up to a bankruptcy are to be considered by the Official Receiver. I made Teesside Police aware of the facts concerning the Official Receiver. There can be little doubt that as he knew my wife had purchased a property for £65.000 cash in May of 1998 then in the circumstances I could not have been bankrupt in the sum of £15.800 regardless of that bankruptcy being engineered by unlawful means. The North Yorkshire Police detectives were also provided by me with copies in my wife's own handwriting of showing that even after the purchase of that property for £65.000 cash she still had close on to thirty thousand pounds remaining in her accounts. My home until late 1997 had previously been registered in the joint names of my wife and myself. Land which was registered solely under my name became registered in the sole name of my wife also around late 1997. It was alleged that the transference of these properties was witnessed by my father in law. He in fact was registered blind and had never at any time witnessed any of my signatures. Following his death in November of 1997, I retained his driving licenses which contained his original signatures. Copies of those too were provided to North Yorkshire Police Officers to assist in my forgery allegations. A few days ago Inspector Napier of North Yorkshire Police wrote to me saying that no evidence of crime had been found and that the matter I had reported was not to be pursued. I enclose a copy of that letter I received from Inspector Napier for your information. I find it strange that Inspector Napier as head of the Complaints and Discipline Department of North Yorkshire Police should have become so involved with matters which were not part of her duties under the department which she heads. I should also make it known that Inspector Napier knew that my allegations against her Chief Constable, Mr Kenworthy, were I regarded so substantial as to amount to the criminal offence of misconduct in public office and that I was therefore lawfully entitled to carry out a citizens arrest of him.. Following that, even though she agreed she had no responsibility in my allegations against Mr Kenworthy, she said she wanted to visit me. The evidence which I provided to North Yorkshire Police to back up my allegations is available to you. I can verify that it is so substantial that for Inspector Napier to claim that I had not provided evidence of my wife's crime is simply astonishing. The fact that the property my wife purchased in May of 1998 is registered at HM Land Registry along with the recorded purchase price she paid for it is substantial proof in itself.

In defence of my wife's actions I agree that she too was under severe stress. One morning in November of 1997 following one of a number of local radio broadcasts on my concerns regarding the power and influence of Freemasonry a man by the name of Mr Frank Last, who then lived at Sherburn Village, called at our home. He tried to persuade me to give up making such radio broadcasts because he said I could never beat Freemasonry. When I made it clear to him that I had no intention of giving the broadcasts he then tried to influence my wife. He told us that a man by the name of John Coates had adopted a similar attitude to me and had refused to give it up. He said that his deep freezer business situated at South Shields had been burnt down as a result of it. Neither my wife or I accepted the latter as fact. In January of 1998 my wife and I visited South Shields when I then met a former work colleague who resided there. When I mentioned the burning down of the deep freezer centre he confirmed to us that it had indeed taken place. When my wife and I arrived home my wife was visibly worried and tried to persuade me to sell our property and flee from the situation. I could not agree to that as I did not accept that such a thing was possible to flee from. A few days later I returned home to find her gone. She had left a note saying that she was sorry but she could not carry on with the way of life both of us were subject of.

Since I reported some of the matters contained herein to you some four years or so ago the injustice of which I am subject has carried on unabated. Possibly one of the reasons for this is that no action was taken to investigate or prosecute some of the offenders. I think it right in the circumstances that as the matters I have made known to you are of grave general public concern and of a very serious nature concerning public authorities, then a government enquiry into them would be the only just way ahead. The Prime Minster has promised us a fairer Britain and continues to make that claim. However I am sad to say that the opposite situation seems to be true.

I am in touch with many victims of police and judicial crime. That crime is substantial and is nearly always ignored by the various authorities empowered to act on it. Indeed there is substantial evidence available that there are procedures commonly used by the various government departments to frustrate those who find it necessary to use such departments as a possible resolution to the crimes committed against them.

A requirement under Human Rights Law and European Union Law is that there should be a Council or Tribunal with the task of providing independent and impartial overall review and control of relations between citizen and the State. If such a Council or Tribunal existed then there would be a course for victims of police and judicial crime to turn to. It is an undeniable fact that when a victim of crime or misconduct by government agencies has to turn to government agencies as a possible means of resolution, then in no way can those agencies be considered as independent or impartial. I call for the setting up of such Council or Tribunal as a matter of great urgency under the Prime Ministers promise of a fairer Britain.

I also have substantial evidence to help show that the main purpose of the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors is to frustrate claims against corruption and misconduct within the legal profession. In my own case, and I am not alone, after more than four years following my complaints of corruption and misconduct by solicitors to the OFSOS in the civil actions between Miss Carr and I, I found it necessary to complain to the Legal Services Ombudsman, Ann Abraham. It was only then that I learned it had been alleged that my files had gone missing from the Office For The Supervision Of Solicitors. The Legal services Ombudsman was not satisfied as to how my files had disappeared. My recent complaints to the Office For the Supervision of Solicitors is receiving the same negative response as I have received from them in the past and has provided further evidence as to the real purpose of OFSOS.. Many such victims of crime and misconduct by solicitors experience similar experiences. As evidence of the huge amount of crime and misconduct by solicitors the Solicitors Indemnity Fund is bankrupt and has been abandoned due to the huge number of successful claims made against it by victims of solicitors misconduct and crime. I would suggest that at least some of yesterdays corrupt solicitors are now today's corrupt judges. Evidence in my case alone helps prove this as fact. There are many more cases to help back up this fact.

As a further fact of life, I like others who contributed to the Nolan Enquiry into Freemasonry within the Police and Judiciary have concluded that the outcome was to hide the real power and influence Freemasonry exercises over our justice system rather than expose it. I have paid a terrible price in recent years and am satisfied that Freemasonry has had a responsibility in at least some of the injustice meted out to me by both the Judiciary and Police. These matters are serious enough but the matter of high authority ignoring such facts is even more alarming.

You are aware that I have huge bundles of documents and evidence to back up the facts which I detail herein to you. I delivered some of them to you several years ago in my first approach to you on some of these matters. They are available for your use or the use of any competent enquiry. Much of the evidence of my allegations is also lodged with the various courts who have ignored it. In fact the Newcastle County Court have refused to allow me access to the recorded proceedings before then recorder John H Fryer-Spedding and are thus held to be party to the concealment of evidence of crime. Those recordings will also show that recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had warned me not to point out to the court when Miss Carr was swearing contrary statements while I carried out my cross examination of her while she was in the witness box. That too was part of the gross misconduct on the part of recorder John H Fryer- Spedding.

I look forward to hearing from you and what you consider will be the best way ahead to resolve the matters I have now reported both to you and the Prime Minister. It remains my opinion that nothing short of a Government Enquiry will suffice even considering that such enquiry could not be considered as being independent and impartial given the fact that most of the crime carried out against me has been by government agencies. As you will be aware there is also the question of abuse of my human rights. I am entitled to protection from the crimes I have reported to you and the Prime Minister. It is very clear from the available evidence that the opposite to that situation is true.

I am lawfully entitled under the crime of misconduct in public office to carry out citizens arrests on those holding public office who have been party to the crime used against me along with those who are shown to have deliberately failed in their public duty to address such crime. However a stumbling block remains that Britain has no Independent Council or Tribunal to address such crime and misconduct. It is not a course of lawful conduct that I would wish to commence but it may however become necessary.

In the light that the matters I have reported to you are considered as being in the public interest and of grave concern, I will copy the contents of this letter to other interested parties. My letter of 4th June 2001 which I sent to the Prime Minister is published on the Internet.

Finally, under the circumstances of what has been carried out by corrupt authority here against me, it is not difficult for me to understand why terrorism exists. When people are deprived of human rights, abused, made to suffer and crimes against them are ignored by governments then such acts are the very seeds of terrorism. I am too old and in too poor health to undertake any terrorism even if I thought it the only way to a form of justice due to the circumstances I have detailed to you. I am however now in a better position to see terrorism from the point of view of terrorists. Mr Kemp, terrorism does not just happen it is caused. Britain remains second only to Turkey in the European League for the abuse of human rights. The bubble of such abuse will burst. History proves that this is bound to happen sooner or later.

Yours sincerely

Mr Maurice Kellett

16A The Lyons

Hetton-le-Hole,

Tyne-Wear DH5 0HT.