Copied below is the affidavit sworn by Shirley Carr on the 12^th of May 1994. The reader will see the obvious perjury sworn in it. There is in fact other perjury contained within it. Why did the judges at the Durham County Court not also see the obvious perjury? Why did recorder John Fryer-Spedding who also had it, obviously ignore its contents and obvious lies?

Notes: Carr agrees in 1) that the two properties No. 16 and No. 16a were divided into two dwellings between 1935 and 1945. With reference to page 2 E) of his approved transcript of judgement why did recorder J H Fryer-Spedding state that No 16 was only divided on the 2^nd of February 1976? The fact is that if the properties had been divided in February 1976 then the owner occupier of No's 16 and 16a could not acquire any rights over the properties which they owned and occupied. Neither could any alleged rights that they might claim that they have acquires pass with the conveyance of the property at the time of their sale. Owners of a property cannot acquire any rights over a property that is owned by them so none can pass in the conveyance of that property to another. It appears that recorder John H Fryer_Spedding was of course aware of that fact. Despite having Carr's affidavit and other documents placed before him that proved that the properties had been divided and occupied by separate tenants since at least before February 1976, it was of relevance if perversion of the course of justice was in mind to create the lie and then act upon it.

Many more facts and evidence relative to this affidavit and also the approved transcript of former recorder John Fryer-Spedding will follow.