Below is copied my claim for damages against Prime Minister Tony Blair. He has been in power since 1997. Under the European Human Rights Convention the British people have the right to independent and impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of their civil rights. Britain has no such authorities. Further, it has been exposed by correspondence between Mr Fraser Kemp MP and the various authorities named on this website, that none of them will accept any responsibility to act on the matter of judicial crime. I have asked Fraser Kemp MP to raise this matter in the House of Commons. His reply to me by letter is that he is not permitted to raise issues in the House of Commons???
Go to pages index.
Go to home page.
The Prime Minister
Mr Tony Blair
10 Downing Street
This matter to be published for and in the general public interest.
Saturday 28th December 2002.
In my letter to you of several months ago, I asked where I could find an impartial and independent tribunal or authority established by law for the resolution of my rights as required under the European Human Rights Convention. That request was made following the judicial crime that has been carried out against me by primarily judges sitting at both the Durham and Newcastle County Courts. Your office failed to reply or acknowledge receipt of that letter. I will refer to these matters later in this letter.
I have asked the same question, as is detailed above, to the manager of the Durham County Court who has also failed to reply or acknowledge receipt of it. The Durham County Court has been involved in serious crime that it used against me involving its judges. It is coming up to a years since I claimed damages from that court resulting on judicial and other crime that have caused me serious harm and damage. The manager of that court has not acknowledged receipt of the claim and it would seem he continues to ignore it. I briefly detail those judicial crimes.
In late 1992 I appealed the judgement of District Judge Scott-Phillips sitting at the Durham County Court in the matter of damage caused to our home following a vehicle collision with it. My appeal was heard by Deputy District Judge Baird. A deputy district judge is not allowed by law to hear any appeal. There is substantial evidence of the attempted cover up of that crime. Then in March of 1994 I was falsely accused of trespass on land, subject of Newcastle County Courts case number NE401650, that both I and my father (now deceased) had used without disturbance for at least twenty seven years. In those circumstances we had acquired lawful title to it. The first judge to hear that case was again Deputy District Judge Baird. I had not recognised him from his earlier illegal act that he used against me as I have mentioned above. DDJ Baird then ignored the evidence that I supplied to him of my and my late fathers title to the land where I was alleged to have been a trespasser. I was in those circumstances being told to accept the ruling of DDJ Baird who I had earlier exposed his having unlawfully heard my appeal in late 1992 relative to damage to our property. Would you accept the ruling of a man who had carried out a serious criminal act against you? I cannot do and will not do that.
Then there took place a series of other crimes used against me . Including the protection of solicitor Nancy Bone, by her acts, was held to be in contempt of court for refusing me rights obtained under a court order at Durham County Court that I be allowed to take copies from my files that she held by lien. I needed them to assist me to continue my actions and defence to the civil cases mentioned herein. When my rights under that Court order was breached and I was unable to take copies from my files, the Durham County Court manager, them Mr I Cuthbertson, informed me that I had not been given a court order to attend the offices of solicitor Nancy Bone but that my attendance at her offices was only by her permission. I knew that was untrue then but could not prove that. Then long after the cases I detail were tried under false allegations of them having been consolidated, solicitor Nancy Bone was struck from the register of solicitors in matters concerning other of her clients. I was only then able to obtain the files that she held on my cases. In those files was verification from solicitor Nancy Bone that it had indeed been by order of the Durham County Court and had not been done by the consent of solicitor Nancy Bone.
Then in October of 1996 this matter of my alleged trespass and two other matters relative to damage to our home under my Durham County Court case DH400898 and DH400950 the latter concerning drainage coming from the property owned by Miss Shirley Carr, who had falsely alleged that I was a trespasser on land that both I and my father held lawful title was unlawfully heard by then recorder John H Fryer-Spedding now living at Mirehouse, Keswick, Cumbria. It was illegal in the first instance because the recorder falsely alleged that the three cases that were being heard by him, being my Durham County Court cases DH400950, DH400898 and Newcastle County Court case Shirley Carr's Newcastle County Court case NE401650 had been subject of consolidation. Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding unlawfully tried them as a single action thus causing me serious damage. The extent of the recorder's acts that perverted the course of justice, are shown by his own approved transcript of judgement, to be so substantial that it is clear to me and others who have looked at them that they could only have been meant to have been deliberate acts to pervert the course of justice. The recorder also agreed in his approved transcript of judgement that it was his intention to deprive me of my rights. He appeared to have fled the scene when I reported some of his criminal acts to former Lord Chancellor Mackay and then the recorder went into what facts show was a sudden decision to retire.
Miss Shirley Carr had unlawfully prepared the judges bundles ready for trial assisted by solicitor Alison Stott, then practising from Aykley Vale Chambers, Aykley Heads, Durham city. Alison Stott had attended the courts with Shirley Carr for around one and a half years before declaring to the Newcastle County Court that she had not been acting for Miss Shirley Carr but had only been assisting her. During the time solicitor Alison Stott had been Shirley Carr's assistant, she had been instrumental in my imprisonment at Durham for my contempt of court. I had suffered a stroke while I was in prison. Durham Prison had told me that I was a civil prisoner and therefor good remission would not have been a factor. I was told I would have to serve the full term of imprisonment. Solicitor Alison Stott had also unlawfully accepted the work of preparing the judges bundles, ready for trial. She then secretly passed on that work for Shirley Carr to carry out. Shirley Carr in turn then left out substantial documentation from the judges bundles. One such document was her application and subsequent refusal by the Durham County Court for consolidation of the three above named cases underway between us. They were Newcastle County Court case NE401650 where I was the defendant in alleged trespass, and cases DH400950 and DH400898 where I was the plaintiff. In these circumstances both Shirley Carr and solicitor Alison Stott were party to fraud that assisted in the perversion of the course of justice.
Then it came to light on the 6th of December 2002 during my long meeting with the solicitor for the Durham District Land Registry, Mr Peed, that Shirley Carr had registered the land subject of my alleged trespass and case NE401650 very shortly after she commenced her action against me. That took place on the 12th of July 1994. She had registered the land to herself as a possessory title. Facts and evidence show that she could not have lawfully registered the land subject of case NE401650 in her name that both I and my father had used without disturbance for around some twenty seven years. The matter was tried, as evidence shows under unlawful circumstances, in October of 1996. Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding ruled that Shirley Carr had no claim to a possessory title to the land. Shirley Carr had never made known throughout the long court proceedings that she had registered the land so shortly after litigation on the matter started. It is shown that for her to have done that would have brought to light that she had registered our land by means of fraud. She had also practised criminal deception to hide the latter fact. That is now shown by the evidence of interrogatories that were served on her prior to the matter being heard by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. While I first went to Houghton-le-Spring Police Station to report the new matter of evidence that had come to light at the Durham District Land Registry on December the 6th 2002, I have never been able to do that. Several excuses were offered to me including one that my case was being dealt with by a special police unit. A senior officer of Northumbria Police refused both to act on the matter and then refused to accept the new evidence that came to light at the Land Registry on the 6th of December 2002.
I had contributed to the House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee Inquiry into Freemasonry within the police and judiciary. I had also publicly expressed concerns about the involvement of Freemasonry within the police and judiciary. That included my radio broadcasts concerning it. After one such broadcast, my wife of thirty years (now divorced) and I received a visit from a man. He told us that unless I stopped publicly expressing my concerns about Freemasonry then our home might be burned down. He said that had happened to a deep freezer centre situated at South Shields, Tyne-Wear when a man with a similar attitude to me regarding Freemasonry who he said owned it, refused to stop expressing his concerns about it . A few weeks later we heard evidence suggesting that the threat to burn down our home was real. My wife left shortly afterwards when I would not agree to sell our home and try to run away from the situation. She commenced divorce proceedings against me several months later. Northumbria Police showed no interest in that matter of the threat against our home or in one where I, my then wife and daughters were threatened to be stabbed by a man who later repeated that threat to police.
Though Shirley Carr and solicitor Alison Stott were, and evidence shows that they were at material times aware that the cases before recorder John H Fryer-Spedding had been illegally tried by reason there was an order in force that the three cases could not be consolidated into Shirley Carr's single case under NE401650, they went ahead in an action for my bankruptcy at the Durham County Court. A court which was not in the circumstances held to be independent and impartial. The bankruptcy obtained against me was published in the press. It included that I was no longer allowed to remain as a Hetton-le-Hole, Tyne-Wear, Town Councillor by virtue of becoming a bankrupt.. My father was extremely distressed at that publication and pleaded with me to leave the matter of Freemasonry alone because of what he too held was foremost in the corruption that had been subjected to by the various judges. We argued about it. Within hours of that publication he collapsed and died.
Previous to that my father had applied to go back into possession of our land. Rdcorder John H Fryer-Spedding agreed that he was likely to have title to it. In fact evidence shows that the recorder would have known that both I and my father had lawful title to that land. My fathers application to be allowed to go back into possession of the land that had been subject of case NE401650 was heard by District Judge Cuthbertson sitting at the Durham County Court. He ruled my fathers application as an abuse of court time. I represented my father in a subsequent appeal against D.J. Cuthbertson's ruling. That was hears before Circuit Judge Helen Paling. She warned me not to speak and then dismissed the action. My father took ill when I was subject to verbal abuse from that court and ran from it.
The Official Receiver situated at Stockton on Tees and other authorities were aware that even had my bankruptcy been obtained by lawful means I could not in any event have been bankrupt. They allowed that situation to continue leading to Miss Shirley Carr then becoming the owner of my home and land.
District Judge Scott-Phillips stands accused by me for his part in crime as was alleged to me by the former Manager of the Durham County Court, Mr I. Cuthbertson. DJ Scott-Phillip's part in it is part of my claim for damages caused to me by the Durham County Court, still he recently ruled that the Teesside County Court could hear an application for possession my home made by Miss Shirley Carr. On the 16th of December it was District Judge Bailey who ruled that I must give up possession of my home by the 28th of December. I had been unable to attend the Teesside court owing to health problems. In any event, as the circumstances show, that court of the 16th of December was in fact ultra vires.
It is worthy of note that I had been in contact with Lord Nolan who chaired the Inquiry into Freemasonry within the police and judiciary until January of 1998 when he then wrote telling me that as he was returning to being a member of the Law Lords and had thereonwards had to be impartial. Though I had requested the judges at the Durham County court to declare any membership of Freemasonry, it met with their refusal to do so. I approached Lord Woolf and Bingham on that matter. They ruled that there was no requirement for the judges to declare any membership of it. The Court Service also decided on behalf of the judges that there was no requirement for them to declare any membership of Freemasonry. Those rulings are now shown to be contrary to Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. In my application for leave to appeal the ruling of John H Fryer-Spedding it was Lord Justice Auld and Pill who heard it. It was Lord Auld who delivered a speech to me that Freemasonry would not have been responsible for my situation. When I wrote to both he and Lord Justice Pill, asking them to declare any membership of Freemasonry as the subject had been discussed by Lord Justice Auld, neither of these judges would declare any membership of it either. That too is held to have been in breach of Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.
I like many other victims of our judiciary I know to exist, could almost certainly have been spared the pain and suffering they have and still are being subjected to if I and they had been able to access such an independent and impartial tribunal or authority established by law for the resolution of our civil rights as is required under Article 6(1) of the Convention. Mr Frase Kemp MP is aware of the crime that has been used against me to bring me to my present situation. He has found from his correspondence with the Home Office, The Parliamentary Commissioner, The Attorney General and the Lord Chancellors Department that there are no authorities in the UK who will act on the matter of judicial crime such as that which has been used against me. This is where at the very least, access to independent and impartial tribunals in such matters for the resolution of my rights is not only a requirement of the European Human Rights Convention for UK citizens but it is essential if this country can be held to have a credible justice system. I asked in my correspondence with Mr Fraser Kemp MP that he raise this very serious issue in the House of Commons. He replied in a letter to me that he is not permitted to raise issues in the House? In the circumstances that I describe here, the credibility of the UK justice system is called into serious question.
I have previously informed your office of many of the facts I give above. As Prime Minister you are held to be responsible for having failed to set in motion any acts to set up independent and impartial tribunals or authorities established by law for the resolution of my civil rights as is required by me, and indeed by all UK citizens, under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention. I hold you in the above circumstances to be held responsible for damages caused to me by failing in your obligations to me as both a UK and European citizen by your failure to uphold my rights under Article 6(1) of the European Human Rights Convention.
I claim from you the sum of £2000.000 for your failure to uphold my rights as detailed above.
I accept that I cannot make my claim against you through the UK court system given the circumstances now prevailing. However I accept that it would be proper for it to be heard and decided upon by such independent and impartial tribunal or authority established by law as the European Human Rights Convention requires. That too remains the situation in the matter of the serious judicial crime that I have briefly mentioned, that has been carried out against me.
Signed by the below signed Maurice Kellett
28th December 2002.
Mr Maurice Kellett
16A The Lyons