Sign In Sign-Up

Go to home page

Go to scan index

1. In the matter of case numbers NE401650, DH400950 and DH400898 it was District Judge Cuthbertson who, in 1995, granted a far reaching injunction in the favour of Miss Shirley Carr which prevented and deterred me from collecting any further evidence for use in the above cases. By that time Miss Shirley Carr had already been allowed the use of material perjury which had been ignored by judges at the Durham County Court. The evidence of that perjury remains and some of is under publication. The injunction was granted by District Judge Cuthbertson at a time when I was not present and had not been informed by the Durham County Court of when it was to take place. Solicitor Alison Stott attended the Durham County Court with Miss Shirley Carr on the day the injunction of which I refer was granted in October of

1995. District Judge Cuthbertson had given work for solicitor Alison Stott to carry out and then adjourned those proceedings. Sometime later that same day solicitor Alison Stott had returned to District Judge Cuthbertson whereupon he granted the injunction of which I refer which, according to solicitor Alison Stott, was granted because I was not present at the court. As I have previously stated, I had not been informed of when those proceedings were to recommence. Under that injunction, so granted under improper conditions, I was imprisoned in July of 1996 at Durham for the alleged breach of it, where I then suffered a stroke.

 7) My attempts at a just resolution of the above facts through the appeal system have all failed. Lord Justices Auld and Pill refused my application for leave to appeal the judgement of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. They cannot reasonably be considered to have been impartial, under the terms of the European Human Rights Convention, in the matter of what amounted to judicial crimes as detailed above.

Mr Fraser Kemp MP up to this present time, has been unable to detail to me any " independent and impartial tribunal" as required under the European Human Rights Convention in the determination of my civil rights regarding the judicial crimes detailed above which have been used against me. The Prime Ministers Office has also detached itself from any liability under the above detailed acts of tyranny.

I have suffered torture, pain, distress, anxiety, and a substantial deterioration of my general health as a result of the above detailed acts of crime carried out against me by the various judges whom I have named herein. I have since 1996 had little choice left open to me but to spend many thousands of hours seated in the preparation of notes, files etc., in attempts at obtaining a just resolution of the judicial crimes detailed above. This has been very damaging to my medical conditions particularly in the matter of rheumatoid arthritis. The stress placed upon my thirty year marriage as a result of the judicial crime and misconduct used against me was a major contributory factor in the destruction of it in 1998. I suffer serious life threatening illnesses which had required my wife’s assistance. Due to the destruction of my marriage as a result of the serious stress placed upon it by the above detailed judicial criminal acts, my suffering has increased considerably where at times, due to a very serious health problems but particularly with rheumatoid arthritis, I have been unable to carry out essential needs which I have required such as medication for other serious health problems at times that I have not been mobile, thus placing my life in danger.

Recorder John Fryer-Spedding’s judgement based on his use of fraud etc., as detailed above and within my Statement of Truth signed by me on the 29th September 1999 allowed Miss Shirley Carr to drain the rear of her property onto the rear of my home number 16A The Lyons, Hetton-le-Hole. At the time he ordered that such drainage could take place, he was fully aware that the drains on the rear of number 16A The Lyons could not cope with the combined drainage from both Miss Shirley Carr’s property number 16 and my property number 16A. This fact is confirmed by means of recorder John H Fryer-Spedding’s own approved transcript of judgement. Several times since my wife left this address in 1998 flooding has occurred at the rear of my home resulting in water entering beneath the floors of it. Previously my wife had to resort to the baling out of water to prevent that from happening. That also placed further stress on my marriage: While it is shown by recorder John~Fryer-Spedding’s approved transcript of judgement that both my father and I clearly had fulfilled the requirements of the Limitations Act in the matter of the land subject of case number NE401650, he allowed the continuation of the situation allowed by Deputy District Judge Baird who had previously carried out a serious criminal act at Durham County Court detailed above, in preventing my and my fathers lawful re-occupation of that land and my exclusion from it. While recorder John H Fryer-Spedding agreed that Miss Shirley Carr had no title to that land, and this is confirmed by his own approved transcript of judgement, she has been allowed to register it in her sole name at HM Land Registry. That has amounted to theft of my and my late fathers property. The land subject of case NE401650 had also comprised as the only practical way to rear of my home and gardens to service them for at least around some one hundred and fifty years. Recorder John Fryer-Spedding falsely alleged that our right of way across the rear garden of Miss Carr’s property, number 16 The Lyons, came to an end because it had not been recorded in the conveyances of that property. The recorder was fully aware of Section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. Evidence clearly shows he ignored it for his purpose of further perverting the course of justice. The result is that since the ruling made by Deputy District Judge Baird in 1994 the only way to service the rear of my home and its gardens has been by means of passage through the living room of my home. That was also a source of distress for my wife who held the responsibility in trying to keep our home clean. The build up of refuse in the rear garden of my home has continued since 1994 and it is no longer possible to service the rear of my home due to the various facts involved with the only route now available being to carry it out being by means of access through the living room of my home. My health problems mean that I already have extreme difficulty in keeping my home clean without the added problem of garden refuse being transported through it and all of the consequences thereby arising. The driveway at the front of number 16 The Lyons, was a joint driveway also to number 16A The Lyons at the time my wife and I purchased the property number 16A The Lyons in February of 1976. It had comprised as the joint driveway of both properties since at least before the turn of the twentieth century. Miss Carr has been allowed to fence off that driveway thus preventing my access to number 16A The Lyons by that means. Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding told me that it was his intention to deprive me of my rights. This fact is also confirmed by his own approved transcript of judgement. The results of recorder John Fryer-Spedding’s perverse judgement which continued with his use of fraud, has left me with a continuing life of extreme suffering and misery where my health continues to be severally affected by it. In the circumstances of the above acts of crime, and others not detailed above, but in other documentation already on the Durham County Court files, amounting to nothing less than the rule of tyranny, has been a gross breach of both my rights under European Human Rights Convention and the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

Within hours of the publication on the front page of the Sunderland Echo newspaper of my alleged bankruptcy and the fact by virtue of the bankruptcy ruling engineered from the costs awarded against me by recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding, I was no longer allowed to remain as a Hetton-le-Hole Town Councillor, a bankruptcy which had been obtained by the use of the various criminal acts detailed above of which fraud was one such serious criminal act, my father collapsed and died. He had been extremely upset at the publication. That caused me added considerable suffering.

In the circumstances of the above and by reason there is no independent and impartial tribunal as required under the European Human Rights Convention, in which I can seek a just resolution to the above matters concerning the use of judicial crime and misconduct and the use of material perjury used by Miss Shirley Carr and others ignored and allowed by the various judges sitting on the above named cases, I claim from the Durham County Court for both its use of judicial crime and its clear intent to ignore the existence of it, the following sum.

In the circumstances that following the bankruptcy which had followed the use of fraud and further deliberate acts to pervert the course of justice by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding and others judges named above, land and property belonging to me was seized by the Official Receiver. I have spent many thousands of hours seeking and trying to obtain the just resolution of my rights under the above crime used against me. There has been no independent and impartial authority established by law as required under the European Human Rights Convention where I can refer the matter of judicial crime and misconduct detailed above in an attempt to obtain a just and final solution to my continual suffering resulting from the crimes I detail herein. This has only resulted in a continuation of attempts to obtain a just solution from authorities who are clearly not impartial in the matter of judicial crime and misconduct. My approaches to Durham Constabulary on the matter of the judicial crimes detailed above resulted in them telling me that when a judge lies it is a judicial decision and is therefore protected by law. That cannot be considered under any circumstances to the true and acceptable situation existing in any truly democratic society.