|
|
The above letter should have been dated 1993 not 1992 as given.
The District Judge referred to above would have been aware that it is unlawful for Deputy District Judge Baird to hear an appeal from an order made by a District Judge. In fact it is illegal for any Deputy District Judge to hear an appeal. The Court manager Mr I. Cuthbertson would also have been aware of that as well. So here we have both a District Judge, believed to have been Mr Scott-Phillips, and the Court Manager, Mr I Cuthbertson clearly covering up unlawful court proceedings. It was a similar a situation to the attempted cover up by the Chief Clerk of Houghton-le-Spring Magistrates Court, Mr Bavidge, when unlawful proceedings had taken place at his court as well following my having been battered and struck by a car that was driven at me in 1986. In that situation The Lord Chancellors Department assisted Bavidge with the cover up of that crime. Bavidge never replied to my letter to him of December 8 1998. That letter is included on this site.
Deputy District Judge Baird was the first one to hear the actions between Carr and I at Newcastle under case NE401650. I had not recognised him then. Otherwise had I done so, I would not have allowed him to preside over the hearing. He had of course previously carried out a serious crime used against me which I had exposed. In the circumstances he also could not have been impartial and independent to the proceedings before him which is required by law. No action was been taken against DDJ Baird even though the Durham County Court were aware that what had taken place with him had been illegal. At the first hearing of case NE401650 DDJ Baird gave Carr everything she wanted from him. He also allowed Shirley Carr the use of two advocates. One of them was Kevin Kerrigan and the other was Professor Kenny. Both were, and may still be, employees of the University of Northumbria Law School. Though I required the assistance of my wife at that time in DDJ Baird's chambers, he refused her entry into his chambers. That was a further illegal act. All litigants are entitled to be accompanied by someone to assist them. I provided to DDJ Baird evidence that Carr had no title to the land subject of dispute and that both myself and my father had legal title to it. He ignored that evidence. He ordered that Carr be allowed to remove the fence which we had placed on our land. He also ordered that Carr was allowed go into possession of it. DDJ Baird and others who used crime against me are being protected by very high level authority. By assisting and protecting criminals and crime these people are also deemed to be criminals by virtue of case law under Regina -v- Dytham. Do their positions of power mean they are exempt from the rule of law? The answer is of course no. However, it would appear that they have come to believe that they are.