Copied below is paragraph 8 of Carr's sworn affidavit of May 12 1994. I have published herein a copy of a letter receiver from the Sunderland Civic Centre confirming that Carr was the applicant for drainage proposals to No 16 The Lyons more than six months before she and a Mr Thomas McCabe were to purchase it. I have shown herein the proof that it was not the Green's who had that work carried out as Carr has sworn, but Carr herself. The drainage work that was carried out by the local authority months before Carr was to purchase No. 16 The Lyons, amounting to a cost of more than two thousand pounds, was in fact paid for by Carr. She shown in the circumstances to have been swearing perjury by stating below, " I have not altered or caused any alteration to my property's.....drains, " It seems too that Shirley Carr was also in fact responsible for alterations to her property's rear yard and guttering. When video film taken of those subjects is converted into photographs, I will show the evidence of that as well.

Note the way that Shirley Carr applies clear deception by  swearing below on May 12 1994, "Following the Plaintiff's complaints I contacted the Drainage Engineers at Sunderland Civic Centre who advised me that the sewerage and frontal drainage of my property was connected to the main drainage system in February, 1988." As the applicant for those drainage proposals Shirley Carr would not have needed to allegedly approach the drainage engineers at Sunderland Civic Centre. That would have been clear to those who looked at her affidavit and the evidence now produced to show the deception used in this matter.

It is confirmed by the evidence placed before criminal former Recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding by a letter received from Sunderland Civic Centre dated July 26 1995 that  Shirley Carr had been responsible for the drainage work on No. 16 The Lyons more than six months before she and a former partner Mr Thomas McCabe were to purchase it on August 26 1988. Shirley Carr swears that she found it necessary to go to Sunderland Civic Centre years after that work was done to ask if the frontage of her property had been connected to the main drains. This is only one in a number of her use of deception. I will detail more of it in time.

She goes on to swear more perjury; " No work was necessary on the rear yard of the property as the yard merely measures 21 foot by 45 inches and has no artificially channelled water entering it or artificially draining from it."  The rear yard of her property is some two feet below natural ground level. It has no drains as she and recorder John H Fryer-Spedding were fully aware of. My property No 16A is in the same situation but has drains. It was agreed by a survey and by recorder John H Fryer-Spedding to be at a lower ground level than Shirley Carr's property. The measures that Shirley Carr had carried out to make sure that our property, No 16A The Lyons received the full drainage from the rear of her property were fully filmed and was shown to recorder John H. Fryer-Spedding. He clearly ignored that evidence which further assisted with the perversion of the course of justice. The film still remains as part of the proof of my allegations against Shirley Carr and recorder John H Fryer-Spedding. Copies of that evidence was also given to Northumbria Police. It was duly signed for by one of their officers at Houghton-le-Spring Police Station. They too continue to ignore it.

Shirley Carr swears that a water barrel was said by drainage experts at Sunderland Civic Centre to be suitable to drain her propertys rear roof into. What local authority drainage experts would agree that a barrel was a satisfactory way to drain the rear of any property's roof into? But in any event two expert surveys of Shirley Carr's property, No. 16 The Lyons, found that the barrel did not contain any drainage in it even after heavy rain. Carr then alleged that the barrel had a hole in it. All guttering allegedly meant to drain into that barrel had been sloped away from it in the direction of my property No 16A. Recorder John H Fryer-Spedding was shown video film showing evidence of that fact. Like the evidence that would have proved my case against Shirley Carr in that matter, he clearly ignored it.

Shirley Carr had agreed that her predecessors in title to her property, the Green's had not made it known that they were concealing that it had no drains when they were attempting to sell their property. Only an idiot would have agreed to buy the property after finding that out without first making all of the necessary inquiries about it. Would Shirley Carr really have paid out more than two thousand pounds for the Local Authority to carry out drainage work on the front of No. 16, six months before she was to purchase it, without having a full  survey on the property's rear drainage after the Greens had attempted to sell her No 16 without making it known that it had no drains? Shirley Carr and her former resident partner, Mr Thomas McCabe, had already been made aware by my wife and I that the rear of No 16 was also without drains. She alleged that we had not made her aware of that. Nonetheless here Shirley Carr, happily swearing perjury as is shown by evidence published on this site, attempting to say that she was not even aware that the front of No 16 was on the mains public drainage system when she in fact had not only been responsible for that work in February 1982, but had paid the full cost of it. These facts would have been blatantly obvious to anyone interested in justice in the situation. That never happened and its clear who were responsible for allowing it.

Go to crime pages index.

Go to general index.

Go to home page.