|
|
EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION.
Tony Blair's office at 10 Downing Street, London, Fraser Kemp MP, and the manager of the Durham County Court have all been asked by me in my letters to them where such authorities or tribunals exist as are required under Article 6) .1 of the European Human rights Convention. They have simply ignored my letters requesting this information.
There are no independent and impartial tribunals in the UK as required below which is a probable reason why they have all failed to answer my questions regarding it. By failing to set in motion any act to establish by law independent and impartial tribunals required by the Convention, Prime Minister Tony Blair is held to be in contempt of the rights of all UK citizens.Acts that perverted the course of justice- John H Fryer-Spedding.
Acts that perverted the course of justice- Shirley Carr.
Acts that perverted the course of justice-Shirley Carr (2)
Acts that perverted the course of justice-Shirley Carr (3)
Acts that perverted the course of justice- solicitor Alison Stott.
Acts that perverted the course of justice- The Durham County Court.
Illegal ruling -Lord Woolf and Bingham.
Illegal ruling- The Court Service.
Article 6 – Right to a fair trial
1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interests of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.2 Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
3 Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
b) to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his defence;
c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
4
d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him; to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.